Native photo, video, or record
May preserve capture time, device details, file path, embedded metadata, application data, and surrounding records.
Insurance claims evidence
Digital evidence can corroborate, contradict, or place limits around a claimed sequence, but photographs, videos, messages, and device records need source context.
Original files
Insurance matters often rely on photographs, videos, screenshots, text messages, email records, claim submissions, repair communications, location information, or files produced after the event. Those records can be useful, but their value depends on how they were created, stored, exported, transferred, and preserved.
Messaging platforms, social media, cloud services, export tools, and file sharing services may strip metadata or create new dates that reflect transmission rather than capture. Forensic review distinguishes the original record from later copies when the evidence allows it.
May preserve capture time, device details, file path, embedded metadata, application data, and surrounding records.
May show useful content but can lose metadata, alter dates, change file names, or obscure the original source.
Claim chronology
Insurance related forensic work should remain objective. The same records may support part of a claim, undermine part of a claim, or show that the available data cannot answer the question with certainty.
Prior files, device activity, account records, communications, and baseline system information.
Photos, videos, messages, location records, application activity, device usage, and related communications.
Claims communications, uploads, forwards, edits, exports, duplicates, cloud sync, and later productions.
Insurance evidence consultation
Rune Forensics can review photographs, videos, metadata, device records, communications, cloud data, location artifacts, screenshots, and claim chronology questions.
Request consultation